The standard flow, and the Sitecore branch.
Every project rides the same governed pipeline. Think of it as two transit routes that share their stations: the Standard line runs on every project, and the Content SDK line stops everywhere the Standard line does — then makes five extra Sitecore stops, to discover the model, provision the cloud, map the components, author the content, and publish it live.
/discover-sitecoreai/provision-sitecoreai/discover-componentsNEW/author-content/publishNEWThe skills that prove out most.
These aren't a wishlist — they're the custom Sitecore skills my agents load the most, ranked here by how often they get pulled into real runs (the never-loaded ones are pruned on purpose). Each was distilled from a session — a trap I hit, a pattern worth keeping — and auto-surfaces by description match. Which ones earn their keep is measured, not guessed.
The head-app build: eight phases, two tracks.
Zooming into /implement: a CMS track (operator works in Sitecore) and a Head-app track (AI works in code) running in parallel, syncing at every stop gate. The build is the same for new and existing sites — the only difference is Phase 02, where existing sites probe + pull and new sites build static-first with a content-model spec for the operator.
The wins that paid for themselves.
Each of these turned a half-day debug session into a one-line rule the agents now follow. Every entry below is encoded as one of the eleven skills above — they are not aspirations, they are the operating playbook.
The honest roadmap.
What's next, and what's deliberately deferred. Multilingual, fully autonomous runs, and a lot of testing and optimization are the forward bets; personalization and forms wait for a real project to ask. None of it is hidden.
Want a Content SDK head app built this way?
The flow has now taken a full brand site all the way to a published, live head app on a real tenant, and is being hardened run over run. If you have a head-app project on the horizon and want to be the next dogfood case, reach out.